Everything about Hela Cell totally explained
A
HeLa cell (also
Hela or
hela cell) is an
immortal cell line used in medical research. The
cell line was derived from
cervical cancer cells taken from
Henrietta Lacks, who died from her cancer on October 4,
1951.
George Otto Gey and Henrietta Lacks
The cells were propagated by
George Otto Gey without Lacks' knowledge or permission (neither she nor her family gave permission) and later commercialized, although never patented in their original form. There was then, as now, no requirement to inform a patient, or their relatives, about such matters because discarded material, or material obtained during surgery, diagnosis or therapy was the property of the physician and/or medical institution. This issue and Ms. Lacks' situation was brought up in the Supreme Court of California case of
John Moore v. the Regents of the University of California. The court ruled that a person's discarded tissue and cells are not their property and can be commercialized.
Initially, the cell line was said to be named after a "Helen Lane" or "Helen Larson", in order to preserve Lacks's anonymity. Despite this attempt, her real name was used by the press within a few years of her death. These cells are treated as cancer cells, as they're descended from a biopsy taken from a visible lesion on the cervix as part of Ms. Lacks' diagnosis of cancer. A debate still continues on the classification of the cells.
HeLa cells are termed
"immortal" in that they can divide an unlimited number of times in a laboratory cell culture plate as long as fundamental cell survival conditions are met (for example being maintained and sustained in a suitable environment). There are many
strains of HeLa cells as they continue to evolve by being grown in
cell cultures, but all HeLa cells are descended from the same tumor cells removed from Ms. Lacks. It has been estimated that the total number of HeLa cells that have been propagated in cell culture far exceeds the number of cells in Henrietta Lacks' body.
Telomerase
The HeLa
cell line was derived for use in
cancer research. These cells proliferate abnormally rapidly, even compared to other cancer cells. HeLa cells have an active version of the enzyme
telomerase during cell division, which prevents the incremental shortening of telomeres that's implicated in aging and eventual cell death. In this way, HeLa cells circumvent the
Hayflick Limit, which is the limited number of cell divisions that most normal cells can later undergo before dying out in cell culture.
Chromosome number
Horizontal gene transfer from
human papillomavirus 18 (HPV18) to
human cervical cells created the HeLa genome which is different from either parent genome in various ways including its number of chromosomes. HeLa cells have a modal
chromosome number of 82, with four copies of chromosome 12 and three copies of chromosomes 6, 8, and 17.
Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are frequently integrated into the cellular DNA in cervical cancers. We mapped by FISH five HPV18 integration sites: three on normal chromosomes 8 at 8q24 and two on derivative chromosomes, der(5)t(5;22;8)(q11;q11q13;q24) and der(22)t(8;22)(q24;q13), which have chromosome 8q24 material. An 8q24 copy number increase was detected by CGH. Dual-color FISH with a c-MYC probe mapping to 8q24 revealed colocalization with HPV18 at all integration sites, indicating that dispersion and amplification of the c-MYC gene sequences occurred after and was most likely triggered by the viral insertion at a single integration site. Numerical and structural chromosomal aberrations identified by SKY, genomic imbalances detected by CGH, as well as FISH localization of HPV18 integration at the c-MYC locus in HeLa cells are common and representative for advanced stage cervical cell carcinomas. The HeLa genome has been remarkably stable after years of continuous cultivation; therefore, the genetic alterations detected may have been present in the primary tumor and reflect events that are relevant to the development of cervical cancer.(External Link
)
Contamination
Because of their avid adaptation to growth in tissue culture plates, HeLa cells are sometimes difficult to control. For example, they've proven to be a persistent laboratory "
weed" and they can contaminate other cell cultures in the same laboratory, interfering with biological research, and forcing researchers to declare many research results invalid because the cells used were found afterwards to be contaminated. The degree of HeLa cell contamination among other cell types is unknown, because few researchers test the identity or purity of already-established cell lines. It has been demonstrated that a substantial fraction of
in vitro cell lines—approximately 10%, maybe 20%, are actually HeLa cells, because the original cells in the cell culture have been overwhelmed by a rapidly growing population derived from HeLa contaminant cells.
Stanley Gartler in 1967 and
Walter Nelson-Rees in 1975 were the first to publish on the contamination of various cell lines by HeLa. This is one account on HeLa as a contaminant. Another account was presented by science writer, Michael Gold.
In
Conspiracy of Cells: One Woman's Immortal Legacy and the Medical Scandal It Caused (ISBN 0887060994), Michael Gold describes Gartler's identification of this problem and Rees' many, and probably career-ending, efforts to identify this problem which Gold felt was occurring both in the best medical and research institutions in the USA and abroad, and in the laboratories of the best physicians, scientists, and researchers, including
Jonas Salk.The HeLa contamination problem however wasn't found in the laboratories run by either Rees or Gey and his wife,
Margaret Gey. Gold also states that this problem almost led to a Cold War incident. Russia and the USA had started to cooperate in the war on cancer launched by President
Richard Nixon and then it was found the cells exchanged were contaminated by HeLa. Gold asks how much time, money and energy was wasted in the war against cancer because of HeLa contamination, or of a problem some call "HeLa". In his epilogue, Gold writes about the contamination problem that "[t]here is more to the problem than a tenacious and hardy cell culture.... HeLa cells persist because they've always been helped along by a certain human element in science, an element connected to emotions, egos, a reluctance to admit mistakes"
"It's all human - an unwillingness to throw away hours and hours of what was thought to be good research...worries about jeopardizing another grant that's being applied for, the hurrying to come out with a paper first. And it isn't limited to biology and cancer research. Scientists in many endeavors all make mistakes, and they all have the same problems".
Gold ends his book with the following statement of a virologist who discovered another contamination problem: "A 'HeLa' ... is a scientific claim that sucks people into a line of work for a while, a line that's later refuted or shown to be a waste of time. It's a type of error in science that occurs fairly often. And it'll continue to exist." Rather than recognize or focus on the problem of HeLa and on how to resolve it, many scientists, researchers and science writers continue to document this problem as a contamination problem, or as a problem caused by the hardiness, tenacity, proliferating or overpowering nature or other characteristic of HeLa.
Other authors have noted the problem of HeLa in science when they examined the issues surrounding the widespread HeLa contamination of cell lines used in research from the 1950s through at least the early 1980s,.Recent data suggest that cross contaminations are still a major ongoing problem with modern cell cultures.
Helacyton gartleri
Due to their ability to replicate indefinitely, and their non-human number of chromosomes,
Leigh Van Valen described HeLa as an example of the contemporary creation of a new species,
Helacyton gartleri, named after
Stanley M. Gartler, who Van Valen credits with discovering "the remarkable success of this species". His argument for speciation depends on three points:
- The chromosomal incompatibility of HeLa cells with humans.
- The ecological niche of HeLa cells.
- Their ability to persist and expand well beyond the desires of human cultivators.
It should be noted that this definition hasn't been followed by others in the scientific community, nor, indeed, has it been widely noted. With near unanimity, evolutionary scientists and biologists hold that a chimeric human cell line isn't a distinct species.
As well as proposing a new species for HeLa cells, Van Valen proposes in the same paper the new family Helacytidae and the genus Helacyton.
Further Information
Get more info on 'Hela Cell'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://hela.totallyexplained.com">HeLa Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |
